Ask Better Questions

Nov 19th, 2008 | By Guy Harris | Category: Communication Skills, Conflict Skills, Featured Articles

One subject keeps surfacing in my work with both my coaching clients and participants in my training classes. The subject takes many forms and shows up in many different situations, but the underlying question remains the same: “How do you move a person (team, organization, etc.) towards higher levels of cooperation and participation?”

Most of us — me included — find it easy to state our opinions and to communicate what we want. However, we often have difficulty understanding what other people want from or see in a situation. This difficulty lies at the heart of the struggle to gain high levels of cooperation and participation.

The problem typically comes not from the logic we use but from our approach. We state our opinions, and we expect people to immediately buy-in. Often, they do not. In his book, Questions are the Answers, Allan Pease says: “If you say it, it’s your idea, not theirs, so [people] feel justified in raising objections…” By stating our opinions first, we often trigger this automatic objection response. As a result, we find ourselves engaged in a double monologue rather than a true dialogue. I say what I think. You say what you think. Neither of us truly connects with the other’s perspective.

Great leaders have the skill of creating true dialogue — not simply double monologue. One highly effective approach to creating dialogue is simple in concept but difficult to apply. Simple in concept because the idea can be easily stated: ask better questions. It is difficult to apply because we have to overcome the natural inclination to state our perspective rather than to ask questions.

When we state a position, it is open for debate, and unlikely to encourage cooperation. If we ask open and genuine questions, other people will often reach the same conclusions we have reached. So, they own the conclusions and are more likely to accept and act on them.

The specific questions you ask will depend almost entirely on the situation. However, I have identified five basic types of questions to keep in mind. Good questions will:

1. Clarify the other person’s perspective

For example…

  • How do you see this situation?
  • If I understand correctly, you feel _____________. Is that correct? 

2. Reveal what the other person knows about a situation

For example…

  • Do you have any experience with this type of situation?
  • How have you approached these issues in the past? 

3. Uncover misunderstandings and miscommunications

For example…

  • I understood that ____________ happened. Have you heard anything about it? 
  • You know, I thought we were supposed to be doing ____________. Was that your understanding also? 

4. Stimulate the other person’s thinking

For example…

  • Why do we do __________ the way that we do it? Is there a better way?
  • Do you know the history on _________________?
  • Do you have any thoughts on how we could improve the process (system, results, etc.)? 

5. Solicit the other person’s ideas

For example…

  • How would you handle this situation? 
  • Is there another option we could consider?  

Good questions create a foundation for higher level thinking and for building a cooperative, participatory environment. One warning — watch your tone and body language. It’s easy to sound aggressive and interrogating. If this happens, the approach fails miserably. Keep your body language and tone open and friendly, and questions can pave the path to better understanding and cooperation.

So for now, I encourage you to remember this tip . . .
 
Ask better questions.

Bookmark and Share


I have moved my blog to RecoveringEngineer.com. Here are excerpts from my two most recent posts. Please join me at my new blog.



Join me at RecoveringEngineer.com

Tags: , , ,

2 comments
Leave a comment »

  1. Guy, I have been following this advice you offered for a few weeks now. Conversations are easier; there is a sense of flow and I don't feel like I have to have all the answers. I am now enjoying listening more and asking better questions. Thanks for the valuable advice.

  2. There's another question that needs to be asked, but indirectly. It is, “What's in it for them?” No matter how good the relationship, most people won't come right out and tell their supervisors that what they suggest is all well and good, but that they personally don't feel they're getting enough out of the exercise to warrant the cooperation and/or participation they're being asked for. That means that the leader needs to find out some other way.

    The answer to “What's in it for me” may be considered to be part of the team's or individual's perspective, but it's not a part leaders are likely to see or hear with the just the five categories of questions listed. This is because employees want to be seen as team players. They don't want their bosses to ever get the idea that they're not concerned about team outcomes. Not only that, but “What's in it for me?” is not the kind of language that team members are supposed to use. It's all supposed to be about “us;” but you can bet that they're all thinking about how doing whatever they're being asked to do will help them personally, either in the company or in their careers, or both.

    It's essential, therefore, that leaders discover the answer to this question first. Whatever input employees offer regarding their perspective, the situation, any misunderstandings or miscommunications, their thinking or their ideas, all be given in this context. I know this sounds cynical, but if we're forced to make choices between our own well-being and that of the team repeatedly, there will come a time when the needs of the individual will take precedent. How much better it would be for leaders to take this into account first rather than having it forced on them later.